Our engineers set up and run your first chatbot / LLM security scan. Get in touch

Art.15: Accuracy, Robustness, Cybersecurity

Technical safeguards against errors, faults, inconsistencies + adversarial inputs.

Last reviewed July 2026

The gap Art.15 closes

In EU AI Act, Accuracy, Robustness, Cybersecurity addresses security. Technical safeguards against errors, faults, inconsistencies + adversarial inputs. Penaxtra records this control at critical severity and establishes its state by exercising it against the running system, so the result reflects observed behavior rather than a documented assertion.

How Penaxtra delivers Art.15

Penaxtra turns this EU AI Act obligation into recurring, testable evidence: scheduled scans and posture checks produce findings tied to Art.15, and the append-only audit log records what was tested and when. The EU AI Act Art.15 identifier is attached when the finding is created, so it appears in the exported evidence pack already mapped to the control. Where the same weakness maps to another framework, the finding carries those control identifiers as well.

Art.15 capabilities

Probe and check coverage aligned to Art

15 (Accuracy, Robustness, Cybersecurity).

Findings tagged with the EU AI Act Art

15 identifier.

Penaxtra severity for this control (critical)

Cross-framework identifiers attached to the same finding where controls overlap

PDF and JSON evidence export with the control identifier attached

Art.15 compliance mapping

Findings for Art.15 carry the EU AI Act Art.15 identifier along with the corresponding control identifiers in the other frameworks Penaxtra maps, so one result is reflected across each mapped framework.

Frequently asked

What is Art.15 (Accuracy, Robustness, Cybersecurity)?

Technical safeguards against errors, faults, inconsistencies + adversarial inputs. It is a EU AI Act control; Penaxtra assesses it at critical severity.

How does Penaxtra test for Art.15?

Penaxtra turns this EU AI Act obligation into recurring, testable evidence: scheduled scans and posture checks produce findings tied to Art.15, and the append-only audit log records what was tested and when.

Does a finding for Art.15 help with an audit?

Each finding is tagged with the EU AI Act Art.15 identifier and exported in the PDF and JSON evidence pack, so it appears on the auditor control list with the identifier already attached.