AI Security Posture Management

AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM)

Continuous discovery, runtime control, adversarial testing, and audit-ready evidence for every AI surface a regulated enterprise runs in production: LLM applications, AI agents, MCP servers, RAG pipelines, vector databases, model endpoints, and runtime gateways.

Penaxtra is the enterprise AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM) platform from Seccops Cyber Security Technologies. It implements the four AI-SPM functions (discover, assess, secure, audit) for organisations running LLM applications and AI agents under regulatory obligations such as the EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, and NIST AI 600-1.

Definition

What is AI Security Posture Management?

AI Security Posture Management (AI-SPM) is the continuous process of discovering, assessing, securing, and proving the compliance posture of AI systems, including LLM applications, agents, MCP servers, RAG pipelines, vector databases, model endpoints, and runtime gateways.

AI-SPM extends established posture management disciplines (CSPM for cloud, DSPM for data, ASPM for applications) into the AI control surface, where attack vectors include prompt injection, tool poisoning, agentic-loop exploits, RAG corpus tainting, vector-database isolation breaks, and model supply-chain risk.

Why now

Why AI-SPM matters for regulated AI teams

SIEM cannot see prompt-level AI risk

Traditional SIEM ingests network and host telemetry. Prompt injection, tool poisoning, and RAG corpus tainting happen at the application layer above the wire. The signal is in JSON request bodies that ordinary detection cannot parse semantically.

CSPM does not cover agentic control surface

Cloud posture tools score IAM, network, and storage configuration. They do not enumerate agent tools, score MCP server permissions, or test prompt flows against OWASP LLM Top 10.

Audit obligations land in 2026

EU AI Act high-risk provider obligations apply from August 2026. ISO/IEC 42001 is moving from pilot to procurement gate. Regulated teams need control-mapped evidence the moment auditors arrive, not a backlog of unmapped findings.

Manual pentests miss the cadence

Foundation models update weekly. A snapshot report from January is stale by March. AI-SPM scans on a schedule (daily or weekly) so the evidence pack tracks the model.

Shadow AI is already in production

Teams ship LLM features faster than security can catalogue them. AI-SPM starts with discovery so the inventory matches what the company actually runs, not what the CMDB says it runs.

Procurement asks for AI-specific posture

Enterprise buyers now request AI security questionnaires alongside the standard SIG / CAIQ. AI-SPM produces the evidence package: framework mappings, subprocessor list, residency map, audit log.

Categories

AI-SPM vs LLM Security

LLM Security is a focused layer within the broader AI-SPM programme. AI-SPM expands the scope from a single model to the full AI control surface.

Dimension
LLM Security
AI Security Posture Management
Scope
LLM applications, prompt flows, model endpoints
LLM apps + agents + MCP servers + RAG + vector DBs + AI gateways + model providers
Asset discovery
Endpoint registration
Full AI asset inventory across 11 AI asset kinds today, including supporting infrastructure
Runtime controls
Prompt-level guardrails, output filtering
DLP firewall, tool allowlist, Ed25519-signed policy, per-domain budgets, six-pass normalization
Compliance mapping
OWASP LLM Top 10
OWASP LLM + OWASP Agentic + NIST AI 600-1 + MITRE ATLAS + EU AI Act + ISO/IEC 42001
Penaxtra
Covered as a sub-layer (see LLM Security Posture Management)
Full AI-SPM platform with control-ID evidence export
Adjacent disciplines

AI-SPM vs CSPM / DSPM / ASPM

AI-SPM does not replace cloud, data, or application posture management. It complements them with AI-specific control coverage.

CSPM

Cloud Security Posture Management. Scores IAM, network, storage, and service configuration across the major cloud providers. AI-SPM extends this with auto-discovery of managed foundation-model and ML platform services, plus tenant-isolation checks for AI workloads.

DSPM

Data Security Posture Management. Maps data stores, classifies sensitive data, scores access. AI-SPM extends this with RAG corpus integrity testing, vector-database isolation, and prompt-level data egress detection.

ASPM

Application Security Posture Management. Consolidates SAST, SCA, secrets, and SBOM across the SDLC. AI-SPM adds AI-BOM (model + prompt + tool inventory), adversarial-prompt testing, and runtime gateway policy distribution.

Asset inventory

What Penaxtra discovers

LLM endpoints

Internal and external chat-completion APIs. HTTP API plus bearer-token auth covered today; SDK auto-discovery on the roadmap.

AI agents + tool catalogues

Agent registrations with their declared tool functions and authorisation scopes. Tool-permission risk scored against the OWASP Agentic Top 10.

MCP servers

Model Context Protocol servers, their tool surface, and the agents that consume them. Cross-domain tool exposure surfaced as findings.

RAG pipelines

Retrieval-augmented generation systems with the embedding model + vector database + data sources they bind. Thirteen automated RAG security tests available.

Vector databases

Managed and self-hosted vector stores, plus relational-engine vector extensions. Tenant isolation, embedding-model linkage, and corpus-integrity tests.

Embedding + fine-tuned + self-hosted models

Three separate catalogues. Fine-tune lineage tracking; self-hosted model endpoint posture; embedding model linkage to the RAG systems that consume it.

Cloud AI services

Auto-discovery of managed foundation-model and ML platform accounts via read-only role across the major cloud providers. Continuous posture scoring + drift detection.

AI applications + prompt gateways

Logical AI applications that bundle endpoints, agents, RAG, and tools into a single risk-owned unit. Plus prompt gateway routing tables and rules.

Runtime controls

Self-hosted runtime AI gateway

An optional self-hosted agent that proxies LLM API calls and applies DLP rules on the wire. Prompts never leave the customer VPC in this deployment mode.

Ed25519-signed policy distribution

Policy bundles are cryptographically signed at the control plane. The agent verifies the signature before applying. A rotated key or revoked policy lands fleet-wide in under a minute.

DLP firewall on the wire

Forty-eight built-in patterns covering credentials, API keys, secrets, PII, payment-card numbers, and seed phrases. Custom patterns supported.

Tool allowlist enforcement

Per-asset scoped tool allowlist. Reject calls to tools the agent is not authorised to invoke, even when the model attempts to call them.

Six-pass normalization

Unicode, leet-speak, zero-width, base64, homoglyph, and HTML-entity decoding before pattern matching. Catches injection variants regex-only filters miss.

Per-domain budgets + rate limits

Daily and monthly caps per upstream LLM provider. Rate limit per agent per minute. Stops runaway cost amplification under reflected-loop attack.

Sub-millisecond filter overhead

P99 filter latency under 0.8 ms in normal traffic. Pipeline runs in-process; no round-trip to the control plane during request handling.

Adversarial testing

Probe coverage and three-judge consensus

50+
Probe families

across OWASP LLM Top 10 + OWASP Agentic Top 10. YAML-extensible.

3+1
Judges + meta

three independent judges (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google) + a meta-judge to resolve disagreement.

6
Frameworks mapped

at the control-ID level across every finding.

Compliance evidence

Audit-ready output across six frameworks

Every finding ships with the control identifier. PDF plus JSON export. Twenty-two cross-framework overlaps pre-computed so one finding satisfies multiple audit cells.

FAQ

AI-SPM questions procurement asks first

How is AI-SPM different from LLM Security?

LLM Security focuses on testing and governing large language model applications and prompt flows. AI-SPM is the broader programme that covers asset discovery, runtime controls, compliance evidence, and audit posture across every AI surface. LLM Security Posture Management is a focused layer within AI-SPM. See the dedicated LLM Security Posture Management page.

How is AI-SPM different from CSPM, DSPM, or ASPM?

CSPM secures cloud configuration. DSPM secures data stores. ASPM secures application security posture. AI-SPM is purpose-built for the AI control surface: LLM endpoints, agent tool permissions, MCP server inventory, RAG corpus integrity, vector database isolation, prompt-injection testing, and AI-framework compliance evidence.

Does Penaxtra sit in my request path?

Only when you deploy the optional self-hosted runtime gateway. The scan engine tests endpoints from the outside on a schedule and never sits inline.

Is Penaxtra a managed service or self-hosted?

The control plane is managed in the EU region. The runtime gateway is downloaded and self-hosted inside the customer VPC. Customers retain full data residency for prompt content.

Which AI frameworks does Penaxtra cover?

Six at control-ID level: OWASP LLM Top 10, OWASP Agentic Top 10, NIST AI 600-1 plus NIST 800-218A, MITRE ATLAS, EU AI Act high-risk provider obligations, and ISO/IEC 42001 Annex A.

What AI asset kinds does Penaxtra inventory?

11 AI asset kinds today: LLM endpoints, tools and functions, AI applications, vector databases, embedding models, fine-tuned models, self-hosted models, model providers, RAG systems, data sources, and prompt gateways. Cloud AI service auto-discovery available as a separate module.

Primary sources

Every framework cited links back to its publisher.

Auditors verify our control mapping against the same documents we read. Each item below points to the canonical publication.

Last reviewed:

Deep dive

The AI-SPM topic cluster.

Capability deep-dives, explainer checklists, public methodology, framework-level mappings, industry use cases, and category comparisons.

Platform AI Asset Inventory 11 AI asset kinds tracked across LLM, agent, MCP, RAG, vector DB. Platform Runtime AI Gateway Self-hosted Go agent. Ed25519-signed policy. Zero prompt egress. Platform MCP Server Security Tool permission risk, confused deputy, tool-call chain detection. Platform RAG Security Corpus tainting, retrieval poisoning, tenant-isolation tests. Platform Vector Database Security Namespace isolation, embedding linkage, metadata-filter integrity. Platform Adversarial Scans 3,500+ probe templates across OWASP LLM, OWASP Agentic, MITRE ATLAS. Compliance EU AI Act Article-level mapping for high-risk providers (Aug 2026 effective date). Compliance ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system control coverage at the Annex level. Compliance NIST AI 600-1 GOVERN / MAP / MEASURE / MANAGE action mapping. Learn MCP Security Checklist Seven-step playbook for onboarding MCP servers safely. Learn What is an AI-BOM? AI Bill of Materials: models, datasets, tools, prompts, dependencies. Methodology Judge Consensus Three-judge plus meta-judge methodology with low-confidence routing. Methodology Privacy Methodology Prompt-egress contract, redaction policy, retention boundaries. Methodology Performance Methodology How gateway overhead, scan-run cost, and wall-time numbers are measured. Use case Banking AI Security Customer-facing assistants under EU AI Act and national banking rules. Use case Healthcare AI Compliance Clinical decision support, PHI controls, post-market monitoring. Compare AI-SPM vs CNAPP Where CNAPP's AI module fits, where AI-SPM extends the surface. Compare AI-SPM vs LLM Guardrails Where inline guardrails fit, where posture management owns the gap.

Run an architecture review with the security team.

A scoped walkthrough of your AI control surface against Penaxtra's 11 AI asset kinds today, runtime gateway capabilities, and six-framework compliance mapping.

Request architecture review Read the platform overview