Prompt content: stays inside the customer network
The gateway agent processes, classifies, and decides locally..
Public methodology behind the privacy claims on the architecture and trust pages. What stays inside the customer network, what leaves it, and how the audit log is bounded.
Last reviewed June 2026
Marketing copy on AI security tools routinely promises privacy without saying what specifically is or is not transmitted. Procurement teams need an explicit data-flow boundary they can quote in a DPA.
The runtime gateway runs inside the customer network. Prompt content never leaves it. Only the allow or block decision and a redacted finding record cross the trust boundary. Judge rationales are PII-redacted before persistence in the control plane.
The gateway agent processes, classifies, and decides locally..
No prompt body, no response body..
The unredacted form exists only transiently inside the judge process..
.
.
.
GDPR Article 5 (data minimisation), Article 28 (processor obligations), Article 32 (security of processing); ISO/IEC 42001 A.7 (data) and A.8 (information management); EU AI Act Article 10 (data and data governance).
No. The runtime gateway agent classifies and decides locally. The control plane receives the decision, not the prompt body. This is enforced by the agent build; the network egress allowlist contains only the control-plane endpoint with a documented payload shape.
Probes are synthetic content authored by Penaxtra Security Research; they contain no customer data. Scan responses from the customer endpoint are processed by the judge pipeline; rationales referencing the response are redacted before persistence.
A deterministic PII-detector runs over every judge rationale before persistence. Detected entities (names, addresses, identifiers, credentials) are replaced with type-prefixed placeholders. The detector list is reviewed each release and documented in the changelog.
Scoped walkthrough of the Methodology / Privacy surface against your environment. No credit card.